Перспективы развития методов верификации диагноза в детской патологоанатомической практике
https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2017-6-3-99-107
Аннотация
Об авторах
Елена Леонидовна ТумановаРоссия
Дмитрий Анатольевич Жакота
Россия
Диана Мядхатовна Мустафина-Бредихина
Россия
Анна Львовна Карпова
Россия
Алексей Валерьевич Мостовой
Россия
Список литературы
1. Мустафин Т. И., Хасанов Р. Р. Актуальные вопросы патологоанатомических исследований и малотравматичные технологии при аутопсии. Медицинский вестник Башкортостана. 2007; 2(1): 47-50.
2. Туманова Е. Л., Жакота Д. А., Корчагина Н. С., и др. Перинатальные патологоанатомические исследования: значение в организации перинатальной помощи и перспективы развития (обзор литературы). Вестник Росздравнадзора. 2016; 3: 34-37.
3. Туманова У. Н., Федосеева В. К., Ляпин В. М., и др. Плод-акардиус: посмертная компьютерная и магнитно-резонансная томография. Диагностическая и интервенционная радиология. 2016; 10 (2): 23-30.
4. Adappa R., Paranjothy S., Roberts Z., Cartlidge P. H. T. Perinatal and infant autopsy. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2007; 92(1): 49-50. https://doi.org/10.1136/adc.2005.091447
5. Arthurs O. J., Taylor A. M., Sebire N. J. Indications, advantages and limitations of perinatal postmortem imaging in clinical practice. Pediatr Radiol. 2015; 45 (4): 491-500. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-014-3165-z
6. Asamura H., Shiozaki T., Sato N., Hayashi T. Trial investigation of post-mortem non-invasive transnasal endoscopy. Forensic Sci Int. 2012; 220(1-3): 184-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2012.02.023
7. Breeze A. C. G., Cross J. J., Hackett G. A., et al. Use of a confidence scale in reporting postmortem fetal magnetic resonance imaging. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2006; 28 (7): 918-24. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.3886
8. Burton E. C., Gurevitz S. A., Collins K. A. Religions and the autopsy [Internet]. medscape.com. 2012 [cited 2017 Jan 15]. Available from: http://emedicine.medscape.com/article/1705993-overview
9. Cox J. A., Lukande R. L., Kalungi S., et al. Practice of percutaneous needle autopsy; a descriptive study reporting experiences from Uganda. BMC Clin Pathol. 2014; 14(1): 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6890-14-44
10. Damore L. J., Barth R. F., Morrison C. D., et al. Laparoscopic postmortem examination: a minimally invasive approach to the autopsy. Ann Diagn Pathol. 2000; 4 (2) :95-98. https://doi.org/10.1053/adpa.2000.0095
11. Fan J. K. M., Tong D. K. H., Poon J. T. C., et al. Multimodality minimally invasive autopsy a feasible and accurate approach to post-mortem examination. Forensic. Sci. Int. 2010; 195 (1-3): 93-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.11.019
12. Foroudi F., Cheung K., Duflou J. A comparison of the needle biopsy post mortem with the conventional autopsy. Pathology. 1995; 27 (1): 79-81.
13. Garg S., Punia R. P. S., Basu S., et al. Comparison of needle autopsy with conventional autopsy in neonates. Fetal Pediatr Pathol. 2009; 28 (3): 139-50.
14. Gilbert-Barness E., ed. Potter’s Pathology of the Fetus, Infant and Child. 2nd ed. Salt Lake City: Mosby; 2007. 2444.
15. Gordijn S. J., Erwich J. J. H. M., Khong T. Y. The perinatal autopsy: pertinent issues in multicultural Western Europe. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2007; 132 (1): 3-7. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2006.10.031
16. Harjeet, Sahni D., Batra Y. K., Rajeev S. Anatomical dimensions of trachea, main bronchi, subcarinal and bronchial angles in fetuses measured ex vivo. Paediatr Anaesth. 2008; 18 (11): 1029-1034. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-9592.2008.02775.x
17. Levin J. Jewish ethical themes that should inform the national healthcare discussion: a prolegomenon. J Relig Health. 2012; 51 (3): 589-600. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10943-012-9617-6
18. Lombardi C. M., Zambelli V., Botta G., et al. Postmortem microcomputed tomography (micro-CT) of small fetuses and hearts. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2014; 44 (5): 600-609. https://doi.org/10.1002/uog.13330
19. Mohammed M., Kharoshah M. A. Autopsy in Islam and current practice in Arab Muslim countries. J Forensic Leg Med. 2014; 23: 80-83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2014.02.005
20. Morgan M. A., D’Souza D. Portal venous gas [Internet]. radiopaedia.org. [cited 2017 Jan 15]. Available from: http://radiopaedia.org/articles/portal-venous-gas
21. Rispler-Chaim V. The ethics of postmortem examinations in contemporary Islam. J Med Ethics. 1993; 19 (3): 164-168.
22. Roberts I. S. D., Benbow E. W., Bisset R., et al. Accuracy of magnetic resonance imaging in determining cause of sudden death in adults: comparison with conventional autopsy. Histopathology. 2003; 42 (5): 424-430. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2559.2003.01614
23. Roberts I. S. D., Traill Z. C. Minimally invasive autopsy employing post-mortem CT and targeted coronary angiography: Evaluation of its application to a routine Coronial service. Histopathology. 2014; 64 (2): 211-217. https://doi.org/10.1111/his.12271
24. Rutty G., Saunders S., Morgan B., Raj V. Targeted cardiac post-mortem computed tomography angiography: A pictorial review. Forensic Science, Medicine, and Pathology. 2012; 8: 40-47.
25. Sebire N. J., Weber M. A., Thayyil S., et al. Minimally invasive perinatal autopsies using magnetic resonance imaging and endoscopic postmortem examination (“keyhole autopsy”): feasibility and initial experience. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012; 25 (5): 513-518. https://doi.org/10.3109/14767058.2011.601368
26. Shojania K. G., Burton E. C. The Vanishing Nonforensic Autopsy. N Engl J Med. 2008; 358 (9): 873-875. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMp0707996
27. Sieswerda-Hoogendoorn T., van Rijn R. R. Current techniques in postmortem imaging with specific attention to paediatric applications. Pediatr Radiol. 2010; 40 (2): 141-152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-009-1486-0
28. Thayyil S., Sebire N. J., Chitty L. S., et al. Post-mortem MRI versus conventional autopsy in fetuses and children: A prospective validation study. The Lancet. 2013; 382; 223-233.
29. Tsujinaka M., Akaza K., Nagai A., et al. Usefulness of post-mortem ophthalmological endoscopy during forensic autopsy: a case report. Med Sci Law. 2005; 45 (1): 85-88.
30. Vaneckova M., Seidl Z., Goldova B., et al. Meningocerebral angiodysplasia: post-mortem magnetic resonance imaging and autopsy. A case report. Neuroradiol J. 2009; 22(4): 435-438.
31. Vester M. E. M., van Rijn R. R. A knot in the gut: A paediatric post-mortem CT diagnosis. J Forensic Radiol Imaging. 2015; 3 (4): 238-240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jofri.2015.05.00
32. Weustink A. C., Hunink M. G. M., van Dijke C. F., et al. Minimally invasive autopsy: an alternative to conventional autopsy? Radiology. 2009; 250 (3): 897-904. https://doi.org/10.1148/radiol.2503080421
33. Woźniak K. J., Moskała A., Kluza P., et al. Whole-body post-mortem computed tomography angiography of a newborn revealing transposition of great arteries. Int J Legal Med. 2015; 129 (6): 1253-1258. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00414-015-1267-2
Рецензия
Для цитирования:
Туманова Е.Л., Жакота Д.А., Мустафина-Бредихина Д.М., Карпова А.Л., Мостовой А.В. Перспективы развития методов верификации диагноза в детской патологоанатомической практике. Журнал анатомии и гистопатологии. 2017;6(3):99-107. https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2017-6-3-99-107
For citation:
Tumanova E.L., Zhakota D.A., Mustafina-Bredikhina D.M., Karpova A.L., Mostovoy A.V. Prospects for the Development of Diagnostic Verification Methods in Pediatric Pathoanatomical Practice. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2017;6(3):99-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2017-6-3-99-107