Anthropometric Parameters in Kyrgyz Males of Various Somatotypes
https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2019-8-1-55-58
Abstract
The aim of research was to obtain data about “somatotypical profile” and some anthropometric parameters in young and adult males, the ethnic Kyrgyz.
Material and methods. The study included 955 healthy young and adult males, ethnic Kyrgyzs, residents of Osh city and its suburbs. To assess their physical development the authors used a method of complex anthropometry and somatotyping. Morphometric processing of the obtained data was performed using statistical programs Microsoft Excel and package STATISTICA (v. 6.0). Differences between two compared values were estimated by Student's distribution at p<0.05.
Results. The most common constitutional types in the Kyrgyz young and adult men appeared to be an abdominal (35–37%), muscular (25–27%) and indefinite (27–30%) constitutional types; thoracic somatotype (9–11%) being the rarest. The performed analysis demonstrated a tendency to increasing the diameter of the wrist and calf during the development from the youth into the 1st and then the 2nd period of adulthood; this was observed in the representatives of all somatotypes. The individual minimum and maximum values of the width of the shoulder girdle were higher in men of the muscular somatotype than in men of the thoracic somatotype regardless of their age; the same parameters had intermediate values in men of the abdominal and indefinite somatotypes.
Conclusion. The obtained data on the distribution of different somatotypes in the Kyrgyz male population and certain anthropometric parameters in the representatives of different somatotypes will contribute to the design of the national standards of physical development; the fact being significant for practical health and theoretical medicine
About the Author
K. Sh. SakibaevRussian Federation
Kyyalbek Sakibaev
Department of Anatomy, Histology and Normal Physiology,
ul. Lenina, 331, Osh, 723500
References
1. Никитюк Б. А., Чтецов В. П. Морфология человека. М.: изд-во МГУ; 1990. 344 [Nikityuk B, Chtecov V. Morfologiya cheloveka. Moscow: Publishing house of Moscow state University; 1990.] (in Russian).
2. Петухов А. Б., Никитюк Д. Б., Сергеев В. Н. Медицинская антропология: анализ и перспективы развития в клинической практике: под общей ред. Д.Б. Никитюка. М.: Медпрактика; 2015. 525 [Petukhov AB, Nikitiuk DB, Sergeev VN. Meditsinskaia antropologiia: analiz i perspektivy razvitiia v klinicheskoi praktike. Moscow: Medpraktika-M; 2015] (in Russian).
3. Сакибаев К. Ш., Алексеева Н. Т., Никитюк Д. Б., Ташматова Н. М., Клочкова С. В. Антропометрические особенности этнических киргизов разных возрастных групп. Журнал анатомии и гистопатологии. 2018; 7(4): 56–60 [Sakibaev KS, Alexeeva NT, Nikityuk DB, Tashmatova NM, Klochkova SV. Anthropometric Features of Ethnic Kyrgyz of Different Age Groups. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2019 Jan 11;7(4):56–60] (in Russian). doi: 10.18499/2225-7357-2018-7-4-56-60.
4. Старчик Д. А. Конституциональноанатомические особенности сердца человека. Морфологические ведомости. 2016; 24(1): 120–124 [Starchik D. Constitutional and anatomical features of human heart. Morphological Newsletter. 2016;24(1):120–4] (in Russian).
5. Тутельян В. А., Разумов А. Н., Клочкова С. В., Алексеева Е. А., Рожкова Е. А., Кварцхелия А. Г., Никитюк Д. Б. Особенности макроантропометрических показателей у женщин разных соматотипов. Морфологические ведомости. 2017; 1(25): 20–22 [Tutel’yan V, Razumov
6. A, Klochkova S, Alekseeva N, Rozhkova E, Kvaratskheliya A, et al. Features of macroanthropometric parameters in women of different somatotypes. Morphological newsletter. 2017 Mar 31;25:20–2] (in Russian). doi: 10.20340/mvmn.17(25)01.04
7. Тутельян В. А., Никитюк Д. Б., Клочкова С. В., Алексеева Н. Т., Расулова М. А., Погонченкова И. В., и др. Использование метода комплексной антропометрии в спортивной и клинической практике. М.: Спорт; 2018; 64 [Tutel’yan V, Nikityuk D, Klochkova S, Alekseeva N, Rassulova M, Pogonchenkova I, et al. Ispol’zovanie metoda kompleksnoi antropometrii v sportivnoi i klinicheskoi praktike. Moscow: Sport; 2018.] (in Russian).
8. Secombe P, Sutherland R, Johnson R. Body mass index and thoracic subcutaneous adipose tissue depth: possible implications for adequacy of chest compressions. BMC Research Notes. 2017 Nov 7;10(1):575–82. doi: 10.1186/s13104-017-2918-9
9. Silventoinen K, Huppertz C, van Beijsterveldt CEM, Bartels M, Willemsen G, Boomsma DI. The genetic architecture of body mass index from infancy to adulthood modified by parental education. Obesity. 2016 Jul 30;24(9):2004–11. doi: 10.1002/oby.21588
10. Wang S, Sun X, Hsia T-C, Lin X, Li M. The effects of body mass index on spirometry tests among adults in Xi’an, China. Medicine. 2017 Apr;96(15):e6596. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000006596.
11. Yen Y-F, Chuang P-H, Yen M-Y, Lin S-Y, Chuang P, Yuan M-J, et al. Association of Body Mass Index With Tuberculosis Mortality. Medicine. 2016 Jan;95(1):e2300. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000002300
12. Zhou Y, Zhang Y, Shi K, Wang C. Body mass index and risk of diabetic retinopathy. Medicine. 2017 Jun;96(22):e6754. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000006754
Review
For citations:
Sakibaev K.Sh. Anthropometric Parameters in Kyrgyz Males of Various Somatotypes. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2019;8(1):55-58. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2019-8-1-55-58