On the Divergence in the Structure of the Human Femur and Some Tetrapods
https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2018-7-4-102-107
Abstract
The aim of the study was to study the divergence in the structure of the human femur and some mammals tetrapods.
Material and methods. The osteometric study was conducted on 404 thighs of modern human, Bos taurus Taurus, L. 1758, Canis lupus familiaris, L. 1758, Oryctolagus cuniculus, L. 1758. 28 homologous structures on each bone were measured. The coefficient of proportionality took into account the influence of animal weight on the formation of the skeleton. The transverse diameter of the shaft in the middle of the bone length was taken as a unit.
Results. As a result, it was found that the main differences in the structure of the femur are associated with an increase in its relative length, the width of the proximal epiphysis, an increase in the head, a decrease in the angles of the anteversion and the diaphyseal angle, a decrease in the bending of the femoral shaft anteriorly and an increase in its relative sagittal diameter. If the constancy of the width of the distal epiphysis of the increased width of the articular surface of the patella and the width of the intercondylar fossa, increased the relative size of the lateral condyle, the size of epicondyles decreased.
References
1. Alekseev V.P. Osteometriya. Metodika antropologicheskikh issledovanii [Osteometry. Methods of anthropological research]. Moscow: Nauka; 1966: 251 (in Russian).
2. Andreeva E.G. O stroenii kostej nekotoryh dikih i domashnih zhivotnyh [On the structure of bones of some wild and domestic animals]. Problems of the origin of Pets. Moscow: USSR Academy of Sciences; 1933: 263–307 (in Russian).
3. Gambaryan P.P. Beg mlekopitayushchih. Prisposobitel'nye osobennosti organov dvizheniya [Running mammals. Adaptive features of the movement]. Leningrad: Nauka; 1972: 334 (in Russian).
4. Gashimova A. A., Aref'eva I. V., S.G. Sajko Cravnitel'naya anatomiya skeleta grudnoj i tazovoj konechnostej sobaki i krolika [Comparative anatomy of the skeleton of the thoracic and pelvic limbs of a dog and a rabbit]. Molodezh' i nauka. 2017; 1: 16–22 (in Russian).
5. Ippolitova V.I. Morfologicheskie parametry trubchatyh kostej v zavisimosti ot polozheniya ih v tazovoj konechnosti [Morphological parameters of tubular bones depending on their position in the pelvic limb]. Reports of the TAA. 1972; 174: 167– 172 (in Russian).
6. Kas'yanenko V.G. Prisposobitel'nye izmeneniya v organah dvizheniya v svyazi s razlichnoj opornoj funkciej [Adaptive changes in the organs of motion due to different support function]. The works of IV all-Union Congress of AHE. Kiev; 1961; 1: 48–56 (in Russian).
7. Kuznecov A.N. Plany stroeniya konechnostej i ehvolyuciya tekhniki bega u tetrapod [The plans for the structure of limbs and evolution of running technique from tetrapod]. Russian Journal of Zoology. 1999; 3: 5–94 (in Russian)
8. Parshina, G.A. Pozhidaeva, V.A. Popova, G.A. Satuchina, Seitov M.S. Sravnitel'naya harakteristika lopatochnoj, plechevoj i bedrennoj kostej zajceobraznyh na primere zajca-rusaka (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) i krolika (Oryctolagus cuniculus Linnaeus, 1758) [Comparative characteristics of the scapular, shoulder and thigh bones of leporids by the example of common hare (Lepus europaeus Pallas, 1778) and rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus Linnaeus, 1758)]. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. Biologicheskie nauki. . 2016; 231–232 (in Russian).
9. Slesarenko N.A., Gasangusejnova E.K., Shirokova E.O Strukturnyj adaptogenez skeleta konechnostej zhivotnyh pri razlichnoj statolokomocii [Structural skeleton adaptogenesis of animals extremities with different statolocomotion]. Izvestiya Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo agrarnogo universiteta. 2013; 5(43): 94–97 (in Russian).
10. Yanson H.A. Biomekhanika nizhnej konechnosti cheloveka [Biomechanics of the human lower limb]. Riga: Zinatne, 1975; 324.
Review
For citations:
Yashina I.N. On the Divergence in the Structure of the Human Femur and Some Tetrapods. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2018;7(4):102-107. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2018-7-4-102-107
Views:
506
Email this article 