Preview

Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology

Advanced search

Anatomical Rationale for Sensory Preservation in Breast Reconstruction Using a Split Thoracodorsal Flap

https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2026-15-1-30-37

Abstract

Autotransplantation of the thoracodorsal flap with complete preservation of its sensitivity is a pressing issue in reconstructive mammoplasty.

The aim was to study the structural features and spatial relationships of the lateral cutaneous branches (LCBs) of the intercostal nerves Th5, Th6, Th7, Th8, Th9 and the thoracodorsal nerve (TDN) in women from the perspective of innervation of the thoracodorsal flap.

Material and methods. Anatomical dissection of the LCBs of the intercostal nerves Th5, Th6, Th7, Th8, Th9 and the TDN along their entire course was carried out in 39 female cadavers (57–97 years of age). The coordinates of the nerve origin points were determined in relation to the clavicle and topographic landmarks. The diameter, length, direction, and angles of inclination in the anatomical planes were measured. Intrafascicular dissection was performed to identify the number of fascicles in the thoracodorsal nerve, along with their diameter, location, and functional type.

Results. In women, the LCBs of the intercostal nerves Th5, Th6, Th7, Th8, Th9 measure 2.6 [1.5; 3.2] cm in length. They arise from the main nerve trunks between the midclavicular and anterior axillary lines, run laterally, and divide into anterior and posterior branches. The anterior branches are directed medially in an oblique downward course at an angle of 50° [42°; 55°], supplying the skin up to the parasternal line. The posterior branches turn posteriorly, follow an oblique upward course at an angle of 44° [36°; 49°] (p<0.001), and supply the skin up to the posterior axillary line. The combined length of the LCBs and their anterior branches is 7.7 [6.4; 8.5] cm; the combined length of the LCBs and their posterior branches is 7.5 [6.6; 8.6] cm (p=0.825); and the combined length of the anterior and posterior branches is 10.3 [10.0; 10.6] cm (p<0.001). The TDN is a mixed nerve. It arises from the posterior cord of the brachial plexus between the midclavicular and anterior axillary lines, located 3.0 [2.2; 3.5] cm below the clavicle and at a depth of 4.3 [3.8; 5.0] cm. In the frontal plane, the nerve deviates laterally from the vertical line at an angle of 40° [30°; 45°]; in the sagittal plane, it deviates posteriorly at an angle of 30° [20°; 35°]. The nerve consists of one motor fascicle with a diameter of 0.3 [0.30; 0.35] mm, located in the posterolateral portion, and one to three sensory fascicles with a diameter of 0.25 [0.25; 0.30] mm (p=0.005), which are situated anteromedially.

Conclusion. The differences in size, spatial distribution, and function between the LCBs of the intercostal nerves Th5, Th6, Th7, Th8, Th9 and the thoracodorsal nerve provide the anatomical basis for preserving sensation when the split thoracodorsal flap is used in reconstructive breast surgery.

About the Authors

N. S. Gorbunov
V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

Nikolai S. Gorbunov – Dr. Sci (Med.), Professor of the Department of Operative Surgery and Topographic Anatomy

ul. Partizana Zheleznyaka, 1, Krasnoyarsk, 660022



K. V. Kober
A.I. Kryzhanovsky Krasnoyarsk Regional Clinical Oncological Dispensar
Russian Federation

Kristina V. Kober – Cand. Sci (Med.), oncologist-surgeon

Krasnoyarsk



E. V. Kasparov
Research Institute of Medical Problems of the North, Krasnoyarsk Scientific Center
Russian Federation

Eduard V. Kasparov – Dr. Sci (Med.), Professor, Director

Krasnoyarsk



S. I. Rostovtsev
V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

Sergei I. Rostovtsev – Dr. Sci (Med.)., Assoc. Prof., of the Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care

Krasnoyarsk



D. N. Gorbunov
V.F. Voino-Yasenetsky Krasnoyarsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

Dmitrii N. Gorbunov – Cand. Sci (Med.), Assoc. Prof. of the Department of Cardiovascular Surgery

Krasnoyarsk



D. N. Lebedeva
Irkutsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

Dar'ya N. Lebedeva – Assist. of the Department of Human Anatomy, Operative Surgery and Forensic Medicine

Irkutsk



O. P. Galeeva
Irkutsk State Medical University
Russian Federation

Ol'ga P. Galeeva – Cand. Sci (Med.), Assoc. Prof. of the Department of Human Anatomy, Operative Surgery and Forensic Medicine

Irkutsk



References

1. Gorbunov NS, Kober KV, Kasparov EV Anatomicheskie osobennosti vyyavleniya dliny grudospinnogo nerva v kachestve nerva-donora [Anatomical features of identifying the length of the thoracospinal nerve as a donor nerve]. Bulletin of Siberian Medicine. 2025;24(4):14–20. (In Russ.). doi: 10.20538/1682-0363-2025-4-14-20.

2. Anthony DJ, Basnayake BMOD, Ganga NMG, Mathangasinghe Y, Malalasekera AP. An improved technical trick for identification of the thoracodorsal nerve during axillary clearance surgery: a cadaveric dissection study. Patient Saf Surg. 2018 Jun 26;12:18. doi: 10.1186/s13037-018-0164-2.

3. Atamian EK, Smith ML. Optimizing aesthetic results in autologous breast reconstruction. Gland Surg. 2023 Aug 30;12(8):1110-1121. doi: 10.21037/gs-22-647.

4. Banys-Paluchowski M, Brus L, Krawczyk N, Kopperschmidt SV, Gasparri ML, Bündgen N. Latissimus dorsi flap for breast reconstruction: a large single-institution evaluation of surgical outcome and complications. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2024 Jan;309(1):269-280. doi: 10.1007/s00404-023-07186-3.

5. Beugels J, Cornelissen AJM, Spiegel AJ, Heuts EM, Piatkowski A, van der Hulst RRWJ, Tuinder SMH. Sensory recovery of the breast after innervated and non-innervated autologous breast reconstructions: A systematic review. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2017 Sep;70(9):1229-1241. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2017.05.001.

6. Bubberman JM, Brandts L, van Kuijk SMJ, van der Hulst RRWJ, Tuinder SMH. The efficacy of sensory nerve coaptation in DIEP flap breast reconstruction - Preliminary results of a doubleblind randomized controlled trial. Breast. 2024 Apr;74:103691. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2024.103691.

7. Chang EI. Advances in Microsurgical Treatment Options to Optimize Autologous Free Flap Breast Reconstruction. J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 24;13(19):5672. doi: 10.3390/jcm13195672.

8. Chang TN, Lu JC, Sung CW, Illias AM, Cheong DC, Kao SW. Elongation of intercostal nerve cutaneous branches for breast and nipple neurotization during breast reconstruction after mastectomy for breast cancer: case-control study. Br J Surg. 2024 Jan 31;111(2):znae005. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znae005.

9. Escandón JM, Manrique OJ, Christiano JG, Mroueh V, Prieto PA, Gooch JC, Weiss A, Langstein HN. Breast reconstruction with latissimus dorsi flap: a comprehensive review and case series. Ann Transl Med. 2023 Aug 30;11(10):355. doi: 10.21037/atm-23-469.

10. Fujita Y, Matsunaga N, De Kerckhove M, Tomita S, Fujii M, Terao Y. Animation of latissimus dorsi flap in breast reconstruction: a retrospective analysis based on 203 cases. J Plast Surg Hand Surg. 2024 Oct 15;59:128-131. doi: 10.2340/jphs.v59.39952.

11. Gardetto A, Hörmann R, Pfitscher K, Konschake M, Stofferin H. Anatomical mapping of the 4th intercostal nerve's lateral cutaneous branch in both sexes: implications for advanced breast Reconstruction. Surg Radiol Anat. 2024 Dec;46(12):2019-2026. doi: 10.1007/s00276-024-03507-6.

12. Gesslbauer B, Hruby LA, Roche AD, Farina D, Blumer R, Aszmann OC. Axonal components of nerves innervating the human arm. Ann Neurol. 2017 Sep;82(3):396-408. doi: 10.1002/ana.25018.

13. Ghumman A, Kim PJ, McAlpine K, Meng F, Snell L, Lipa J. Sensory restoration following breast reconstruction with operative reinnervation: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2025 Mar;102:412-425. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2024.10.021.

14. Heine N, Eigenberger A, Brebant V, Hoesl V, Brix E, Prantl L, Kempa S. Comparison of skin sensitivity following breast reconstruction with three different techniques: Autologous fat grafting, DIEP flap and expander/implant1. Clin Hemorheol Microcirc. 2022;80(4):389-397. doi: 10.3233/CH219203.

15. Laurent R, Trifan A, Danino AD, Paek LS, Schoucair R, Pauchot J, Bernier C, Briand E, Danino MA. Autogenous breast reconstruction for total mastectomies: a narrative review. Ann Transl Med. 2024 Feb 1;12(1):9. doi: 10.21037/atm-23-1471.

16. Araújo Pereira Lisboa FC, Paulinelli RR, Campos Veras LP, Jubé Ribeiro LF, Pádua Oliveira LF, Sousa Rahal RM, Sousa AG, Freitas-Júnior R, Batista de Sousa J. Aesthetic results were more satisfactory after oncoplastic surgery than after total breast reconstruction according to patients and surgeons. Breast. 2023 Oct;71:47-53. doi: 10.1016/j.breast.2023.07.006.

17. Ma Y, Khan MAA, Javed AA, Mohan A, Bhatti D, Khalil N, Rayatt S. Somato-somatic theory of referred pain elucidates observations of referred sensations during micropigmentation of nippleareolar complex in a cohort study on patients undergoing pedicled latissimus dorsi flap breast reconstruction. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2022 Jun;67(3):140-147. doi: 10.1016/j.anplas.2022.03.004.

18. Potter SM, Ferris SI. Vascularized Thoracodorsal to Suprascapular Nerve Transfer, a Novel Technique to Restore Shoulder Function in Partial Brachial Plexopathy. Front Surg. 2016 Mar 14;3:17. doi: 10.3389/fsurg.2016.00017.

19. Romansky R. Latissimus dorsi (thoracodorsal) flap - the universal reconstructive tool. Sofia: [publisher not specified]; 2022. 72 p.

20. Sapino G, Tay SK, Maruccia M, Nanhekhan L, Watfa W, Mantovani GP, Guillier D, Tedeschi P, Bramhall R, Di Summa PG. Abdominal-Based Microsurgical Breast Reconstruction: How to Inset the Flap to Maximize the Aesthetic Result-A Systematic Review. J Clin Med. 2023 Sep 22;12(19):6135. doi: 10.3390/jcm12196135.

21. Sepolvere G, Blanco R. Anterior and posterior chest wall blocks. In: Sepolvere G, Silvetti S, editors. Fast-track in cardiac anesthesia. Cham: Springer; 2024. p. [chapter page range]. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-70899-2_8.

22. Silverstein ML, Momeni A. Restoring Sensation through Abdominal Flap Neurotization in Breast Reconstruction. J Clin Med. 2024 Jun 29;13(13):3826. doi: 10.3390/jcm13133826.

23. Steele TN, Teotia SS, Haddock NT. Multi-Flap Microsurgical Autologous Breast Reconstruction. J Clin Med. 2024 Sep 9;13(17):5324. doi: 10.3390/jcm13175324.

24. Tokgöz S, Karaca Umay E, Yilmaz KB, Akkoca M, Akinci M, Azili C. Role of Intraoperative Nerve Monitoring in Postoperative Muscle and Nerve Function of Patients Undergoing Modified Radical Mastectomy. J Invest Surg. 2021 Jul;34(7):703- 710. doi: 10.1080/08941939.2019.1684603.

25. Voineskos SH, Olaiya OR, Tsangaris E, Kaur M, Klassen AF, Pusic AL. Comparing Breast Sensation between Alloplastic and Autologous Breast Reconstruction Patients Using the BREAST-Q Sensation Module. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2022 Dec 1;150(6):1202e-1213e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000009723


Review

For citations:


Gorbunov N.S., Kober K.V., Kasparov E.V., Rostovtsev S.I., Gorbunov D.N., Lebedeva D.N., Galeeva O.P. Anatomical Rationale for Sensory Preservation in Breast Reconstruction Using a Split Thoracodorsal Flap. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2026;15(1):30-37. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2026-15-1-30-37

Views: 156

JATS XML


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-7357 (Print)