Peri-Implantation Targeting Using Modified Adenoviral Vectors
https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2024-13-4-61-74
Abstract
The aim was to conduct a comparative morphological analysis of the effect of implantation and modified adenovirus Ad 5/3 on the efficiency of local gene delivery to cells of the peri-implantation niche in vivo. Material and methods. The experiments were carried out on laboratory rats, which were implanted with collagen membranes for a period of 2 weeks. Three and seven days after the introduction of adenoviruses (wt, Ad 5/3), the tissues were fixed for histological examination and analysis of transduced cells by in situ PCR. Results. The results showed that the presence of a collagen implant improved the biodistribution of viral particles, and the modification of Ad 5/3 significantly increased the efficiency of transduction of fibroblasts and macrophages in the peri-implantation zone. In the absence of an implant, the transduction efficiency decreased for both types of adenoviruses. Morphometric analysis revealed that the main transduced cells were fibroblasts of the connective tissue capsule surrounding the implant. Conclusion. Based on comparative morphological and molecular biological studies, an optimal protocol for local gene delivery using adenoviral vectors for peri-implantation targeting was determined. The effect of adenovirus modification on the tropism and efficiency of gene delivery to the cellular components of the PIN was characterized, and it was found that Ad 5/3 significantly exceeds AD wt in these parameters. The development and further application of the peri-implantation targeting method proposed by us can ensure local, effective and safe gene delivery, which will significantly expand the indications for gene therapy and its availability to doctors and patients. In addition, this method can be adapted for use in various organs and for various diseases.
Keywords
About the Authors
N. B. SerezhnikovaRussian Federation
Natal'ya B. Serezhnikova – Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Professor, Leading Researcher of Digital Microscopic Analysis Laboratory
ul. Trubetskaya, d. 8, str. 2, Moscow, 119048
A. L. Faizullin
Russian Federation
Aleksei A. Faizullin – Cand. Sci. (Med.), Head of Digital Microscopic Analysis Laboratory
Moscow
A. A. Antoshin
Russian Federation
Artem A. Antoshin – Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Director of Advanced Research and Development
Moscow
A. A. Timakova
Russian Federation
Anna A. Timakova – Junior Researcher of Digital Microscopic Analysis Laboratory
Moscow
E. I. Ivanova
Russian Federation
Elena I. Ivanova – Junior Researcher of Digital Microscopic Analysis Laboratory
Moscow
B. P. Ershov
Russian Federation
Boris P. Ershov – laboratory assistant of the regenerative veterinary medicine laboratory
Moscow
N. M. Faizullina
Russian Federation
Nafisa M. Faizullina – Cand. Sci. (Chem.), Leading Researcher of Modern Biomaterials Department
Moscow
I. V. Ulasov
Russian Federation
Il'ya V. Ulasov – Doct. Sci. (Biol.), Leading Researcher of Modern Biomaterials Department
Moscow
A. S. Malogolovkin
Russian Federation
Aleksandr S. Malogolovkin – Cand. Sci. (Biol.), Head of Molecular Virology Laboratory
Moscow
S. L. Kotova
Russian Federation
Svetlana L. Kotova – Cand. Sci. (Chem.), Leading Researcher of the Macromolecular Design Laboratory
Moscow
P. S. Timashev
Russian Federation
Petr S. Timashev – Doct. Sci. (Chem.), Associate Professor, Scientific Director of the Biomedical Science and Technology Park
Moscow
References
1. Amani H., Alipour M., Shahriari E., Taboas J. Immunomodulatory Biomaterials: Tailoring Surface Properties to Mitigate Foreign Body Reaction and Enhance Tissue Regeneration. Advanced Healthcare Materials. 2024:2401253.
2. Antoshin A., Gostev M., Khristidis Y., Giliazova A., Voloshin S., Blagushina N., et al. Electrophoretically Co-Deposited CollagenLactoferrin Membranes with Enhanced ProRegenerative Properties for Oral Soft Tissue Regeneration. Int J Mol Sci. 2023;24(24):17330.
3. Athanasopoulos T., Munye M.M., Yanez-Munoz RJ. Nonintegrating Gene Therapy Vectors. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am. 2017;31(5):753-70.
4. Dunbar C.E., High K.A., Joung J.K., Kohn D.B., Ozawa K., Sadelain M. Gene therapy comes of age. Science. 2018;359(6372):eaan4672.
5. Foroushani F., Dzobo K., Khumalo N., Mora V., de Mezerville R., Bayat A. Advances in surface modifications of the silicone breast implant and impact on its biocompatibility and biointegration. Biomaterials Research. 2022;26(1):80.
6. Goswami R., Subramanian G., Silayeva L., Newkirk I., Doctor D., Chawla K., et al. Gene Therapy Leaves a Vicious Cycle. Front Oncol. 2019;9:297.
7. Greber U.F., Gomez-Gonzalez A. Adenovirus - a blueprint for gene delivery. Curr Opin Virol. 2021;48:49-56.
8. Ikeda-Imafuku M., Wang L., Rodrigues D., Shaha S., Zhao Z., Mitragotri S. Strategies to improve the EPR effect: A mechanistic perspective and clinical translation. Journal of Controlled Release. 2022;345:512-536.
9. Ivanova E., Fayzullin A., Minaev N., Dolganova I., Serejnikova N., Gafarova E., Tokarev M., Minaeva E., Aleksandrova P., Reshetov I., Timashev P., Shekhter A. Surface Topography of PLA Implants Defines the Outcome of Foreign Body Reaction: An In Vivo Study. Polymers. 2023;15(20):4119.
10. Ji Z., Wan Y., Wang H., Yu M., Zhao Z., Wang T. et al. Effects of surface morphology and composition of titanium implants on osteogenesis and inflammatory responses: a review. Biomedical Materials. 2023;18(4):042002.
11. Koteneva P., Kosheleva N., Fayzullin A., Khristidis Y., Rasulov T., Kulova A., et al. Gene Therapeutic Drug pCMV-VEGF165 Plasmid ('Neovasculgen') Promotes Gingiva Soft Tissue Augmentation in Rabbits. Int J Mol Sci. 2024;25(18):10013.
12. Madry H., Gao L., Rey-Rico A., Venkatesan J.K., Muller-Brandt K., Cai X., et al. Thermosensitive Hydrogel Based on PEO-PPO-PEO Poloxamers for a Controlled In Situ Release of Recombinant Adeno-Associated Viral Vectors for Effective Gene Therapy of Cartilage Defects. Adv Mater. 2020;32(2):e1906508.
13. Mao Y., Hou X., Fu S., Luan J. Transcriptomic and machine learning analyses identify hub genes of metabolism and host immune response that are associated with the progression of breast capsular contracture. Genes & diseases. 2024;11(3):101087.
14. Nestiс D., Bozinoviс K., Pehar I., Wallace R., Parker A., Majhen D. The revolving door of adenovirus cell entry: not all pathways are equal. Pharmaceutics. 2021;13(10):1585.
15. Sharma D., Arora S., Singh J., Layek B. A review of the tortuous path of nonviral gene delivery and recent progress. International journal of biological macromolecules. 2021;183:2055-2073.
16. Steinhauff D., Ghandehari H. Matrix Mediated Viral Gene Delivery: A Review. Bioconjug Chem. 2019;30(2):384-99.
17. Stepanenko A., Sosnovtseva A., Valikhov M., Chernysheva A, Cherepanov S., Yusubalieva G. et al. Superior infectivity of the fiber chimeric oncolytic adenoviruses Ad5/35 and Ad5/3 over Ad5-delta-24-RGD in primary glioma cultures. Molecular Therapy-Oncolytics. 2022;24:230-248.
18. Tucci F., Scaramuzza S., Aiuti A., Mortellaro A. Update on Clinical Ex Vivo Hematopoietic Stem Cell Gene Therapy for Inherited Monogenic Diseases. Mol Ther. 2021;29(2):489-504.
19. Xiang Y., Lee J., Li Z., Loh X. Recent development of synthetic nonviral systems for sustained gene delivery. Drug Discovery Today. 2017;22(9):1318-1335.
Review
For citations:
Serezhnikova N.B., Faizullin A.L., Antoshin A.A., Timakova A.A., Ivanova E.I., Ershov B.P., Faizullina N.M., Ulasov I.V., Malogolovkin A.S., Kotova S.L., Timashev P.S. Peri-Implantation Targeting Using Modified Adenoviral Vectors. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2024;13(4):61-74. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2024-13-4-61-74