Preview

Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology

Advanced search

Analysis of the Structural Organization of the Human Finger Phalanges Using Anatomical Network Models

https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2024-13-3-35-40

Abstract

Despite the fact that the morphogenetic mechanisms of human finger transformation during ontogenesis are currently known, the issues of how they are organized into a complex integrated structure of the distal hand remains open. This question remains unanswered for several reasons, including the lack of consensus on conceptual definitions and approaches, as well as tools for assessing and comparing variations in several anatomical parts of the hand. The aim of the study was to investigate the structural organization of the human finger phalanges using anatomical network analysis (AnNA). Material and methods. In this study, the authors applied the IGRAPH package functions in the R data analysis programming environment for AnNA. Network modeling and layout were performed using the Fruchterman-Reingold algorithm. Analysis of the structure, as well as modularity and integration in the networks, was performed using the spin-glass algorithm. X-ray osteometric indices of the I–V fingers phalanx length were used to assess AnNA in 100 men and 100 women of the middle age without traumatic changes, deformations, and developmental deviations. Results. AnNA demonstrates a two-level organization of the distal hand in the form of a proximal module including the proximal phalanges and a distal module combining the middle and distal phalanges. When comparing the features of the network models of the distal hand, it was found that in women, the organization of the finger phalanges is characterised by higher morphological integration and modularity (modularity 0.43) than in men (modularity 0.38). orphological modularity and integration are organizing factors in the structure of the finger phalanges of the human distal hand. Conclusion. The study results demonstrate that the structural organization of the finger phalanges of the human hand is a system of individual anatomical modules of the phalanges.

About the Author

A. S. Ermolenko
Honored Doctor of Russia E.M. Chuchkalov Ulyanovsk Regional Clinical Center for Specialized Types of Medical Care ; Private University REAVIZ
Russian Federation

Aleksandr S. Ermolenko– Cand. Sci. (Med.), traumatologist-orthopedist of Honored Doctor of Russia

ul. Koryukina, 28, Ulyanovsk, 432063 



References

1. Ermolenko AS Svidetel'stvo RF o gosudarstvennoi registratsii bazy dannykh №2021622030; 2021 (In Russ.).

2. Perepelkin A.I., Krayushkin A.I., Doronin A.B., i dr. Autopodium cheloveka (anatomiya stopy i kisti). Volgograd: izd-vo VolgGMU; 2020. 135 (In Russ.).

3. Chavez T.J, Morrell N.T. The Evolution of the Human Hand From an Anthropologic Perspective. The Journal of hand surgery. 2022; 47(2):181– 185. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhsa.2021.07.006

4. Conaway M.A., Adams D.C. An effect size for comparing the strength of morphological integration across studies. Evolution. 2022; 76(10):2244– 2259.

5. Conaway M.A., von Cramon-Taubadel N. Morphological integration of the hominoid postcranium. Journal of human evolution. 2022; 171:103239. DOI: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2022.103239

6. Csardi G., Nepusz T. The igraph software package for complex network research. International Journal of complex systems. 2006; 1695(5):1–9. URL: http://www.interjournal.org/manuscript_abstract.php?361100992

7. Diogo R., Esteve-Altava B., Smith C. et al. Anatomical Network Comparison of Human Upper and Lower, Newborn and Adult, and Normal and Abnormal Limbs, with Notes on Development, Pathology and Limb Serial Homology vs Homoplasy. PLoS One. 2015; 10(10):e0140030. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0140030

8. Diogo R., Molnar J.L., Rolian C., Esteve-Altava B. First anatomical network analysis of fore- and hindlimb musculoskeletal modularity in bonobos, common chimpanzees, and humans. Scientific reports. 2018; 8(1):6885. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-018-25262-6

9. Glover J.D., Sudderick Z.R., Shih B.B., et al. The developmental basis of fingerprint pattern formation and variation. Cell. 2023, 186(5):940– 956.e20. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2023.01.015

10. Jaworski T., Karpi?ski R., Dobrowolska A. Biomechanics of the upper limb. Journal of Technology and Exploitation in Mechanical Engineering. 2016; 2(1):56–59. DOI: 10.35784/jteme.517

11. Li J., Glover J.D., Zhang H., Peng M, et al. Limb development genes underlie variation in human fingerprint patterns. Cell. 2022; 185(1):95-112.e18. DOI: 10.1016/j.cell.2021.12.008

12. McQueen C., Towers M. Establishing the pattern of the vertebrate limb. Development. 2020; 147(17):dev177956. DOI: 10.1242/dev.177956

13. Patel B.A., Maiolino S.A. Morphological Diversity in the Digital Rays of Primate Hands. In: T. Kivell, P. Lemelin, B. Richmond, D. Schmitt (eds.). The Evolution of the Primate Hand. Developments in Primatology: Progress and Prospects. New York: Springer; 2016: 55–100. DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-3646-5_4

14. Petit F., Sears K.E., Ahituv N. Limb development: a paradigm of gene regulation. Nature reviews. Genetics. 2017; 18(4):245–258. DOI: 10.1038/nrg.2016.167

15. Rasskin-Gutman D., Esteve-Altava В. Connecting the dots: anatomical network analysis in morphological EvoDevo. Biological Theory. 2014; 9(2):178–193. DOI: 10.1007/s13752-014-0175-x

16. Saxena A., Cooper K.L. Diversification of the vertebrate limb: sequencing the events. Current opinion in genetics & development. 2021; 69:42–47. DOI: 10.1016/j.gde.2021.02.005

17. Yang Z., Algesheimer R., Tessone C.J. A Comparative Analysis of Community Detection Algorithms on Artificial Networks. Scientific reports. 2016; 6:30750. DOI: 10.1038/srep30750

18. Ziermann J.M., Boughner J.C., Esteve-Altava B., Diogo R. Anatomical comparison across heads, fore- and hindlimbs in mammals using network models. Journal of anatomy. 2021; 239(1):12–31. DOI: 10.1111/joa.13409


Review

For citations:


Ermolenko A.S. Analysis of the Structural Organization of the Human Finger Phalanges Using Anatomical Network Models. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2024;13(3):35-40. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2024-13-3-35-40

Views: 222


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-7357 (Print)