Fundamentals, biological, medical and social aspects of assisted reproductive technologies: history of creation, current state, prospects

The achievements of biology and medicine in recent decades include the creation of assisted reproductive technologies (ART). The main methods of ART are: cryopreservation of male and female germ cells, thawing of gametes, artificial insemination, in vitro fertilization (IVF), intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI), donation of oocytes and sperm, cultivation of embryos after in vitro fertilization, cryopreservation of embryos, thawing of embryos, preimplantation genetic diagnostics, embryo selection, embryo transfer into the uterus or fallopian tubes, surrogacy. The development of the fundamental principles of ART has a long history. The idea of the possibility of artificial insemination was put forward in the 17th century by A. Leeuwenhoek. Successful transplantations of embryos from the body of one animal to the body of another with the birth of cubs were carried out in the 19th century. In the mid-twentieth century, the results of the development of ART methods received technological significance, and from the middle of the 20th century, ART methods moved into animal husbandry practice. ART entered medical practice in the last quarter of the twentieth century. An outstanding contribution to the introduction of ART in medicine was made by English scientists – veterinarian and physiologist Robert Geoffrey Edwards (1925–2013), who optimized the IVF method for medicine, and obstetrician-gynecologist Patrick Christopher Steptoe (1913–1988), who developed laparoscopic methods for obtaining human eggs. As a result of their activities, in 1978, the first child was born, conceived as a result of IVF and subsequent implantation into the uterus. To date, over 12 million children have been born worldwide using IVF. For example, the number of births after overcoming infertility with the help of ART was 36,008 in Russia in 2019, which is 2,4% of the total number of births in the country. Along with medical aspects, the introduction of ART into medical practice required the adoption of a number of new laws regulating this type of medical activity. Despite the successes achieved, society continues to have an ambiguous attitude towards the introduction of ART into medical practice.

1. Bashmakova NV, Polyakova IG, Ryabko EV. Recent developments in providing medical insurance for reproductive health: global and national trends. Problemy reprodukcii. 2023 Jan 1;29(5):37–44 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/repro20232905137

2. Bashmakova NV, Tsyvian PB, Chistyakova GN, Dankova IV, Trapeznikova YuM, Bychkova SV, et al. The cardiovascular system in children conceived by assisted reproductive technologies. Rossiyskiy Vestnik Perinatologii i Pediatrii (Russian Bulletin of Perinatology and Pediatrics). 2016 Jan 1;61(5):14–8 (In Russ.). doi: 10.21508/1027-4065-2016-61-5-14-18

3. Biograficheskii slovar' deyatelei estestvoznaniya i tekhniki: [v 2 tomakh]. Moscow: Bol'shaya sovetskaya entsiklopediya; 1958;1;. 1959;2 (In Russ.).

4. Georgievskii VI. Fiziologiya sel'skokhozyaistvennykh zhivotnykh. Moscow: Agropromizdat; 1990 (In Russ.).

5. Dankova IV, Yakornova GV, Malgina GB, Mazurov DO, Chermyaninova OV, Bychkova SV, et al. ART monitoring program under the Compulsory Health Insurance (CHI): first results. Problemy reprodukcii. 2017 Jan 1;23(4):65–70 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/repro201723465-70

6. Kirienko KV, Apryshko VP, Yakovenko SA. Assisted hatching (literature review). Problemy reproduktsii. 2019;25(4):89–101 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/repro20192504189

7. Kogan IYu, Gzgzyan AM, Lesik EA. Protokoly stimulyatsii yaichnikov v tsiklakh EKO. Rukovodstvo dlya vrachei. Moscow: GEOTAR-Media; 2017 (In Russ.).

8. Korsak VS, Smirnova AA, Shurygina OV. Russian A T. Register, 2016. Problemy reprodukcii. 2018 Jan 1;24(6):8–21 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/repro2018240618

9. Korsak VS, Smirnova AA, Shurygina OV. ART Register of RAHR, 2017. Problemy reprodukcii. 2019 Jan 1;25(6):9–21 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/repro2019250619

10. Korsak VS, Smirnova AA, O.V. Shurygina. ART Register of RAHR, 2019. Problemy reprodukcii. 2021 Jan 1;27(6):14–29 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/repro20212706114

11. Krasnopol’skaya KV, Nazarenko TA, Beketova AN, Cherkezov YA, Badalyan GV. A priority of gonadotropin selection for ovarian stimulation in IVF programs. Problemy reprodukcii. 2016 Jan 1;22(1):44–4 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/repro201622144-49

12. Krasnopolskaja KV, Samoilova AA, Ershova IY, Isakova KM, Koneeva TO, Bocharova TV. Peculiarities of reproductive status during embryo cultivation using traditional and time-lapse technology (TLT). Problemy reprodukcii. 2023 Jan 1;29(5):45–53 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/repro20232905145

13. Krasnoschoka OE, Smolnikova VYu, Kalinina EA. Clinical and embryological aspects of elective single embryo transfer. Problemy reproduktsii. 2015;21(2):51–7 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/repro201521252-57

14. Laureaty Nobelevskoi premii: Entsiklopediya: A – L. Perevod s angl. Moscow: Progress; 1992 (In Russ.).

15. Laureaty Nobelevskoi premii: Entsiklopediya: M – Ya. Perevod s angl. Moscow: Progress; 1992 (In Russ.).

16. Lokshin VN, Rybina AN, Abshekenova AT, Askar E, Karibaeva ShK, Valiev RK. Personalization of assisted reproductive technologies – myth or reality? Problemy reprodukcii. 2022 Jan 1;28(2):76–80 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/repro20222802176

17. Lopyrin AI. Biologiya razmnozheniya ovets. Moscow: Kolos; 1971 (In Russ.)

18. Lopyrin AI, Loginova NV, Karpov PL. Opyt mezhporodnoi peresadki zarodyshei. Sovetskaya zootekhniya. 1950;8:50–64 (In Russ.).

19. Milovanov VK. Tekhnologiya iskusstvennogo osemeneniya i biologiya vosproizvedeniya sel'skokhozyaistvennykh zhivotnykh. Moscow: Kolos; 1972. (In Russ.).

20. Nikitin AI. Sleduet li uluchshat' demograficheskie pokazateli s pomoshch'yu vspomogatel'nykh reproduktivnykh tekhnologii? Biosfera. 2010;2(3):386–91 (In Russ.).

21. Nikitin AI. Offspring’s health after IVF (literature review). Problemy reprodukcii. 2019 Jan 1;25(3):28–8 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/repro20192503128

22. Nikitin AI. IVF as a mirror of evolution. Problemy reprodukcii. 2022 Jan 1;28(2):81–5 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/repro20222802181

23. Nikitin AI, Kitaev EM, Savitskii GA, Ivanova RD, Kalashnikova RP, Ustinkina TI. Ekstrakorporal'noe oplodotvorenie u cheloveka s posleduyushchei implantatsiei embriona i rozhdeniem rebenka. Arkhiv anat. 1987;93(10):39–43 (In Russ.).

24. Savel’eva GM, Kas’ianova GV, Dronova MA, Karachunskaia EM. Assisted reproductive technologies: рerinatal outcomes and children’s health. Problemy reproduktsii. 2014;20(6):35–9 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/repro201420635-39

25. Sazonova A. Neonatal outcome after IVF. Problemy reproduktsii. 2016;22(2):65–72 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/repro201622265-72

26. Stadnikov AA, Shevlyuk NN, Semchenko YuP. Vvedenie v embriologiyu. Pod redaktsiei prof. AA Stadnikova i prof. NN Shevlyuka. Orenburg: Izdatel'skii tsentr OGAU; 2009 (In Russ.).

27. Firsova NV, Nigmatova NP, Safronova KA, Gartsman AA, Kanbekova OR, Balyberdina MA, et al. Efficacy of PGT in IVF cycles: experience of clinics group. Problemy reprodukcii. 2021 Jan 1;27(6):115–24 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/repro202127061115

28. Folty Ya, Novy L. Istoriya estestvoznaniya v datakh: Khronologicheskii obzor. Perevod so slovatskogo. M.: Progress; 1987 (In Russ.).

29. Chalova LR, Lokshin VN, Kinzhibayev AA. Oocyte donation from medical professionals’ view. Problemy reprodukcii. 2022 Jan 1;28(6):79–87 (In Russ.). doi: 10.17116/repro20222806179

30. Chebotnikova TV. Gonadotropiny: istoriya sozdaniya. Vestnik reproduktivnogo zdorovâ. 2008 Mar 15;(1-2):78–9 (In Russ.). doi: 10.14341/brh20081-278-79

31. Shevlyuk NN. Gistologi, tsitologii i embriologi Rossii (XVIII – nachalo XXI veka). Kratkii nauchno-biograficheskii spravochnik. Orenburg: Izd-vo OrGMU; 2023 (In Russ.).

32. Adler A, Lee HL, McCulloh DH, Ampeloquio E, Melicia Clarke-Williams, Brooke Hodes Wertz, et al. Blastocyst culture selects for euploid embryos: comparison of blastomere and trophectoderm biopsies. PubMed. 2014 Apr 1;28(4):485–91. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.11.018

33. Aliani F, Haghshenas Z, Vosough DA, Arabipoor A, Vesali S, Ashrafi M. Birth prevalence of genital anomalies among males conceived by intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles: A cross-sectional study. International journal of reproductive biomedicine. 2023 Feb 8;21(1):53–60. doi: 10.18502/ijrm.v21i1.12666

34. Alviggi C, Santi D, Esteves SC, Claus Yding Andersen, Humaidan P, Chiodini P, et al. Clinical relevance of genetic variants of gonadotrophins and their receptors in controlled ovarian stimulation: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Human Reproduction Update. 2018 Sep 1;24(5):599–614. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmy019

35. Aparicio-Ruiz B, Romany L, Meseguer M. Selection of preimplantation embryos using time-lapse microscopy in in vitro fertilization: State of the technology and future directions. Birth Defects Research. 2018 May 1;110(8):648–53. doi: 10.1002/bdr2.1226

36. Barbash-Hazan S, Frumkin T, Malcov M, Yaron Y, Cohen T, Azem F, et al. Preimplantation aneuploid embryos undergo self-correction in correlation with their developmental potential. Fertility and Sterility. 2009 Sep 1;92(3):890–6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.07.1761

37. Barrie A, Homburg R, McDowell G, Brown J, Kingsland C, Troup S. Preliminary investigation of the prevalence and implantation potential of abnormal embryonic phenotypes assessed using time-lapse imaging. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2017 May;34(5):455–62. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2017.02.011

38. Belva F, Bonduelle M, Roelants M, Verheyen G, Van Landuyt L. Neonatal health including congenital malformation risk of 1072 children born after vitrified embryo transfer. Human Reproduction. 2016 May 10;31(7):1610–20. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dew103

39. Bosch E, Alviggi C, Lispi M, Conforti A, Hanyaloglu AC, Chuderland D, et al. Reduced FSH and LH action: implications for medically assisted reproduction. Human Reproduction [Internet]. 2021 Jun 1;36(6):1469–80. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deab065

40. Casarini L, Riccetti L, De Pascali F, Nicoli A, Tagliavini S., Trenti T, et al. Follicle-stimulating hormone potentiates the steroidogenic activity of chorionic gonadotropin and the anti-apoptotic activity of luteinizing hormone in human granulosa-lutein cells in vitro. Molecular and Cellular Endocrinology. 2016 Feb 1;422:103–1. doi: 10.1016/j.mce.2015.12.008

41. Chen L, Yang T, Zheng Z, Yu H, Wang H, Qin J. Birth prevalence of congenital malformations in singleton pregnancies resulting from in vitro fertilization/intracytoplasmic sperm injection worldwide: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2018 Mar 1;297(5):1115–30. doi: 10.1007/s00404-018-4712-x

42. Dang TT, Phung TM, Le H, Nguyen TBV, Nguyen TS, Nguyen TLH, et al. Preimplantation Genetic Testing of Aneuploidy by Next Generation Sequencing: Association of Maternal Age and Chromosomal Abnormalities of Blastocyst. Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences. 2019 Dec 20;7(24):4427–31. doi: 10.3889/oamjms.2019.875

43. Ericson A, Kallen B. Congenital malformations in infants born after IVF: a population-based study. Human Reproduction. 2001 Mar 1;16(3):504–9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/16.3.504

44. Fauser BCJM, Devroey P, Diedrich K, Balaban B, Bonduelle M, Delemarre-van de Waal HA, et al. Health outcomes of children born after IVF/ICSI: a review of current expert opinion and literature. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2014 Feb;28(2):162–82. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2013.10.013

45. Gardner SR. Sir Robert Geoffrey Edwards CBE. 27 September 1925 — 10 April 2013. Biographical Memoirs of Fellows of the Royal Society. 2015 Jan;61:81–102. doi: 10.1098/rsbm.2014.0020

46. Gullo G, Scaglione M, Antonio Simone Laganà, Perino A, Andrisani A, Chiantera V, et al. Assisted Reproductive Techniques and Risk of Congenital Heart Diseases in Children: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Reproductive Sciences. 2023 May 5;30(10):2896–906. doi: 10.1007/s43032-023-01252-6

47. Hansen M, Kurinczuk JJ, de Klerk N, Burton P, Bower C. Assisted Reproductive Technology and Major Birth Defects in Western Australia. Obstetrics & Gynecology. 2012 Oct;120(4):852–63. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e318269c282

48. Ho JR, Woo I, Louie K, Salem W, Jabara SI, Bendikson KA, et al. A comparison of live birth rates and perinatal outcomes between cryopreserved oocytes and cryopreserved embryos. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2017 Oct 1;34(10):1359–66. doi: 10.1007/s10815-017-0995-2

49. Hoorsan H, Mirmiran P, Chaichian S, Moradi Y, Hoorsan R, Jesmi F. Congenital Malformations in Infants of Mothers Undergoing Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Study. Journal of Preventive Medicine and Public Health. 2017 Nov 1;50(6):347–60. doi: 10.3961/jpmph.16.122

50. Johnson MH. Robert Edwards: the path to IVF. Reproductive Biomedicine Online. 2011 Aug 1;23(2):245–62. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2011.04.010

51. Klemetti R, Gissler M, Sevón T, Koivurova S, Ritvanen A, Hemminki E. Children born after assisted fertilization have an increased rate of major congenital anomalies. Fertility and Sterility. 2005 Nov;84(5):1300–7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.03.085

52. Lacamara C, Ortega C, Villa S, Pommer R, Schwarze JE. Are children born from singleton pregnancies conceived by ICSI at increased risk for congenital malformations when compared to children conceived naturally? A systematic review and meta-analysis. JBRA Assisted Reproduction. 2017;21(3):251–9. doi: 10.5935/1518-0557.20170047

53. Lagalla C, Tarozzi N, Sciajno R, Wells D, Di Santo M, Nadalini M, et al. Embryos with morphokinetic abnormalities may develop into euploid blastocysts. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2017 Feb;34(2):137–46. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2016.11.008

54. La Marca A, Sunkara SK. Individualization of controlled ovarian stimulation in IVF using ovarian reserve markers: from theory to practice. Human Reproduction Update. 2013 Sep 29;20(1):124–40. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmt037

55. Licata D, Garzena E, Mostert M, Farinasso D, Fabris C. Congenital malformations in babies born after assisted conception. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 1993 Apr;7(2):222–3. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3016.1993.tb00397.x

56. Lindgren I, Bååth M, Uvebrant K, Dejmek A, Kjaer L, Henic E, et al. Combined assessment of polymorphisms in theLHCGRandFSHRgenes predict chance of pregnancy afterin vitrofertilization. Human Reproduction. 2016 Jan 14;31(3):672–83. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dev342

57. Lindgren I, Nenonen H, Henic E, Bungum L, Prahl A, Bungum M, et al. Gonadotropin receptor variants are linked to cumulative live birth rate after in vitro fertilization. Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2018 Sep 19;36(1):29–38. doi: 10.1007/s10815-018-1318-y

58. Los FJ, Van Opstal D, van den Berg C. The development of cytogenetically normal, abnormal and mosaic embryos: a theoretical model. Hum Reprod Update. 2004 Jan-Feb;10(1):79–94. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmh005

59. Lu HF, Peng FS, Chen SU, Chiu BC, Yeh SH, Hsiao SM. The outcomes of intracytoplasmic sperm injection and laser assisted hatching in women undergoing in vitro fertilization are affected by the cause of infertility. DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals). 2015 Apr 29;9(1):33–40. doi: 10.22074/ijfs.2015.4206

60. Macklon NS, Stouffer RL, Giudice LC, Fauser BCJM. The Science behind 25 Years of Ovarian Stimulation for in Vitro Fertilization. Endocrine Reviews. 2006 Apr 1;27(2):170–207. doi: 10.1210/er.2005-0015

61. Mastenbroek S, Repping S. Preimplantation genetic screening: back to the future. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England). 2014 Sep 1;29(9):1846–50. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deu163

62. Mertzanidou A, Wilton L, Cheng J, Spits C, Vanneste E, Moreau Y, et al. Microarray analysis reveals abnormal chromosomal complements in over 70% of 14 normally developing human embryos. Human Reproduction (Oxford, England). 2013 Jan 1;28(1):256–64. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des362

63. Munné S, Cohen J. Advanced maternal age patients benefit from preimplantation genetic diagnosis of aneuploidy. Fertility and Sterility. 2017 May;107(5):1145–6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.03.015

64. Nakhuda G, Jing C, Butler R, Guimond C, Hitkari J, Taylor E, et al. Frequencies of chromosome-specific mosaicisms in trophoectoderm biopsies detected by next-generation sequencing. Fertility and Sterility. 2018 May 1;109(5):857–65. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.01.011

65. Neal SA, Morin SJ, Franasiak JM, Goodman LR, Juneau CR, Forman EJ, et al. Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is cost-effective, shortens treatment time, and reduces the risk of failed embryo transfer and clinical miscarriage. Fertility and Sterility. 2018 Oct;110(5):896–904. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2018.06.021

66. Popovic M, Dhaenens L, Boel A, Menten B, Heindryckx B. Erratum. Chromosomal mosaicism in human blastocysts: the ultimate diagnostic dilemma. Human Reproduction Update. 2020 Apr 14;26(3):450–1. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmaa015

67. Rechitsky S, Pakhalchuk T, San Ramos G, Goodman A, Zlatopolsky Z, Kuliev A. First systematic experience of preimplantation genetic diagnosis for single-gene disorders, and/or preimplantation human leukocyte antigen typing, combined with 24-chromosome aneuploidy testing. Fertility and Sterility. 2015 Feb;103(2):503–12. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.11.007

68. Sahin L, Bozkurt M, Sahin H, Gürel A, Yumru AE. Is preimplantation genetic diagnosis the ideal embryo selection method in aneuploidy screening? The Kaohsiung journal of medical sciences. 2014;30(10):491–8. doi: 10.1016/j.kjms.2014.05.008

69. Thornburg KL, Shannon J, Thuillier P, Turker MS. In utero life and epigenetic predisposition for disease. Advances in Genetics. 2010;71:57-78. doi: 10.1016/B978-0-12-380864-6.00003-1

70. Vermey BG, Chua SJ, Zafarmand MH, Wang R, Longobardi S, Cottell E, et al. Is there an association between oocyte number and embryo quality? A systematic review and meta-analysis. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2019 Nov;39(5):751–63. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2019.06.013

71. Wan CY, Song C, Diao LH, Li GG, Bao ZJ, Hu XD, et al. Laser-assisted hatching improves clinical outcomes of vitrified–warmed blastocysts developed from low-grade cleavage-stage embryos: a prospective randomized study. Reproductive BioMedicine Online. 2014 May;28(5):582–9. doi: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2014.01.006

72. Zeng M, Su S, Li L. The effect of laser-assisted hatching on pregnancy outcomes of cryopreserved-thawed embryo transfer: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Lasers in Medical Science. 2017 Nov 7;33(3):655–66. doi: 10.1007/s10103-017-2372-x