Ultrasound Morphometry of the Pelvic Floor Muscles in Women of Reproductive Age

Biometric studies in nulliparous women conducted to date are limited by small sample sizes. The pelvic floor muscles perform an important function throughout a woman’s life. They provide fixation and maintenance of the pelvic organs, stretches during childbirth, ensuring the formation of the birth canal, and are a potential site for the formation of a hernia in the female body. Impaired function of this muscle group can lead to either excessive muscle contraction (chronic pelvic pain syndrome) or excessive stretching (pelvic organ prolapse). The purpose of the study is to assess the morphometric properties of the pelvic floor muscles in nulliparous women using 3D ultrasound scanning (sonography). Material and methods. The observation group consisted of 60 women of middle reproductive age who applied for an appointment with an obstetriciangynecologist with complaints of pain of various types localized in the perineum and pelvis, decreased desire and quality of sexual life, clinically confirmed by a diagnosis of incompetence of the pelvic floor muscles. The control group consisted of 30 women without dysfunction of the pelvic floor muscles according to clinical examination. The main criterion for inclusion of patients in the study was reproductive age - 18–45 years and natural childbirth in obstetric and gynecological history. Results. We found that the absence of visible sonographic markers of changes in the myofascial structures of the pelvis is not a prognostically significant criterion for muscle dysfunction, since predominantly changes in morphometric parameters are a reliable sign of the formation of pelvic floor muscle failure. Conclusion. The ultrasound morphometry method, which allows one to assess dynamic changes in the size of muscle and fascial structures, can be used in the clinical practice of an obstetrician-gynecologist. Early diagnosis of a violation of the structure of pelvis myofascial complex will allow early implementation of measures aimed at prevention and timely treatment.

1. Akulenko LV, Kasyan GR, Kozlova YuO, Tupikina NV, Vishnevsky DA, Pushkar DYu. Female pelvic floor dysfunction from the perspectives of genetic studies. Urologiia. 2017 Apr 5;1:76–81 (In Russ.). doi: 10.18565/urol.2017.1.76-81

2. Bychenko VV, Rukhlyada NN. Influence of the Mode of Delivery on the Pelvic Floor Muscle Dysfunction Occurrence and Progression. Medical Newsletter of Vyatka. 2020;3(67):9–12 (In Russ.). doi: 10.24411/2220-7880-2020-10097

3. Krasnopolskaya IV, Kareva ЕN, Tikhonov DА. Sex Steroid Receptor Expression in the Paraurethral Tissue of Pelvic Floor Dysfunction Patients. Doctor.Ru. 2018;2(146);75–79 (In Russ.).

4. Krutova V.A, Nadtochy A.V. Comparative prospective study of biofeedback therapy and neuromuscular electrical stimulation in rehabilitation of patients with pelvic floor dysfunctions. Sechenov Medical Journal. 2019; 10 (3): 13–21 (In Russ.). doi: 10.26442/22187332.2019.3.13-21

5. Aleksandrov A, Smith AV, Rabischong B, Botchorishvili R. Mesh-less laparoscopic treatment of apical prolapse. Facts, Views and Vision in ObGyn. 2021 Jun 30;13(2):179–81. doi: 10.52054/fvvo.13.2.013

6. Baines G, Price N, Jefferis H, Cartwright R, Jackson SR. Mesh-related complications of laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy. International Urogynecology Journal. 2019 Apr 30;30(9):1475–81. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03952-7

7. Gagyor D, Kalis V, Smazinka M, Rusavy Z, Pilka R, Ismail KM. Pelvic organ prolapse and uterine preservation: a cohort study (POP-UP study). BMC Women’s Health. 2021 Feb 17;21(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12905-021-01208-5

8. Ichikawa M, Kaseki H, Akira S. Laparoscopic versus abdominal sacrocolpopexy for treatment of multi-compartmental pelvic organ prolapse: A systematic review. Asian Journal of Endoscopic Surgery. 2018 Feb;11(1):15–22. doi: 10.1111/ases.12478

9. Illiano E, Konstantinos Giannitsas, Costantini E. Comparison between laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy with hysterectomy and hysteropexy in advanced urogenital prolapse. International Urogynecology Journal. 2020 Mar 5;31(10):2069–74. doi: 10.1007/s00192-020-04260-1

10. Illiano E, Natale F, Antonella Giannantoni, Marilena Gubbiotti, Matteo Balzarro, Costantini E. Urodynamic findings and functional outcomes after laparoscopic sacrocolpopexy for symptomatic pelvic organ prolapse. International Urogynecology Journal. 2019 Feb 2;30(4):589–94. doi: 10.1007/s00192-019-03874-4