Bilateral Dimorphism of the Auricles in 18–20-year-old Girls

The aim of the study was to identify somatotypological features of linear parameters and bilateral dimorphism of the auricles in 18–20-year-old girls. Material and methods. The study included 140 girls aged 18–20 permanently living on the territory of the Luhansk People's Republic. They were exposed to somatotyping and cephalotyping. During auriculometry, 20 linear dimensions of each auricle were measured. The results obtained were processed using ANOVA and MANOVA and correlation analyses. The index of bilateral dimorphism of auriculometry parameters was determined. Differences in mean values were considered statistically significant at p<0,05. Results. As revealed, the auriculometric parameters of the left auricle exceeded those of the auricle of the contralateral side. Average value of the physiognomic length of the left auricle (n=140) was 61,40 mm, that was 3,55% (p<0,001) bigger than the corresponding parameter of the right auricle. In addition, the maximum index value of bilateral dimorphism (0,069) was registered during the analysis of the height of the tragus. In girls with normosthenic body type (n=69), the morphological width of the left auricle and its height also significantly exceeded the corresponding values of the auricle of the opposite side by 4,12% (p=0,017) and 5,56% (p<0,001), respectively. Variance analysis of the results obtained indicates that the somatotype of women, largely than the cephalotype, affects the variability of the auriculometric parameters. Correlation analysis of the findings allowed identifying predominantly statistically significant positive correlations of varying degrees between the studied parameters. The closest correlation (r>0,90) was determined between the physiognomic length and the length of the cartilaginous part, and between the physiognomic length and height of both the right and left auricles. Conclusion. The data obtained relating the constitutional features of the auricular structure in girls aged 18–20 are of practical significance to study the external ear intravitally, and to optimise surgical options for the auricle shape correction.

1. Bunak VV. Antropologiya: Kratkii kurs. M.; 1941 (In Russ).

2. Daikhes NA, Diab KM, Kondratchikov DS, Pashchinina OA., Balakina LV. Ear Deformities in Children. Voprosy sovremennoi pediatrii – Current Pediatrics. 2022;21(4):298–304. (In Russ). doi: 10.15690/vsp.v21i4.2434

3. Zaichenko A.A., Gerasimova S.Yu., Sinyukova A.I. Ushnaya rakovina devushek: svyazi s razmerami tela. Materialy mezhdunarodnoi nauchnoi konferentsii, posvyashchennoi 80-letiyu so dnya rozhdeniya professora Asfandiyarova Rastyama Izmailovicha. 22-23 sentyabrya 2017. Astrakhan'; 2017:68–70 (In Russ).

4. Pipiya ISh. Issledovaniya anatomomorfologicheskikh osobennostei ushnykh rakovin s tsel'yu identifikatsii lichnosti. Problemy ekspertizy v meditsine. 2007;25(1):61–3 (In Russ).

5. Rossinkaya ER, Zinin AM. The value of the human auricle for its identification. Sudebnomeditsinskaia ekspertiza. 2022 Jan 1;65(3):30–2 (In Russ). doi: 10.17116/sudmed20226503130.

6. Ahmed AA, Omer N. Estimation of sex from the anthropometric ear measurements of a Sudanese population. Legal Medicine. 2015 Sep;17(5):313–9. doi: 10.1016/j.legalmed.2015.03.002

7. Alexander KS, Stott DJ, Sivakumar B, Kang N. A morphometric study of the human ear. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2011 Jan;64(1):41–7. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2010.04.005

8. Brinkmann F, Dinakaran M, Pelzer R, Grosche P, Voss D, Weinzierl S. A Cross-Evaluated Database of Measured and Simulated HRTFs Including 3D Head Meshes, Anthropometric Features, and Headphone Impulse Responses. Journal of the Audio Engineering Society. 2019 Sep 21;67(9):705–18. doi: 10.17743/jaes.2019.0024

9. Japatti SR, Engineer PJ, Reddy BM, Tiwari AU, Siddegowda CY, Hammannavar RB. Anthropometric Assessment of the Normal Adult Human Ear. Annals of Maxillofacial Surgery. 2018;8(1):42–50. doi: 10.4103/ams.ams_183_17

10. Khobkhun P, Pungrasmi P, Suwajo P, Nilprapha K, Meevassana J, Promniyom P, et al. An anthropometric study of the external ear in the Thai population. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. 2022 Apr 1;75(4):1417–23. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2021.11.065

11. Kim HY, Shin CH, Lee YA, Chang Ho Shin CH, Kim GH, Ko JM. Deciphering Epigenetic Backgrounds in a Korean Cohort with Beckwith– Wiedemann Syndrome. Annals of laboratory medicine. 2022 Nov 1;42(6):668–77. doi: 10.3343/alm.2022.42.6.668

12. Martin R, Knuβmann R. Anthropologie. Handuch der vergleichenden biologie des menschen. Stuttgart and New York: Gustav Fischer Verlag; 1988.

13. Murgod V, Angadi P, Hallikerimath S, Kale A. Anthropometric study of the external ear and its applicability in sex identification: assessed in an Indian sample. Australian Journal of Forensic Sciences. 2013 Dec;45(4):431–44. doi: 10.1080/00450618.2013.767374

14. Pelzer R, Manoj Dinakaran, Brinkmann F, Lepa S, Grosche P, Weinzierl S. Head-related transfer function recommendation based on perceptual similarities and anthropometric features. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2020 Dec 1;148(6):3809–17. doi: 10.1121/10.0002884

15. Prasetyo AT, Putri IL. Anthropometric Study of Human Ear: A Baseline Data for Ear Reconstruction. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery. 2021 Oct 7;33(4):1245–9. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000008199

16. Purkait R. Progression of Growth in the External Ear from Birth to Maturity: A 2-Year Follow-Up Study in India. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2013 Mar 22;37(3):605–16. doi: 10.1007/s00266-013- 0097-1

17. Sforza C, Grandi G, Binelli M, Tommasi DG, Rosati R, Ferrario VF. Age- and sex-related changes in the normal human ear. Forensic Science International. 2009 May 30;187(1-3):110.e1– 7. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.02.019

18. Stitt P, Katz BFG. Sensitivity analysis of pinna morphology on head-related transfer functions simulated via a parametric pinna model. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America. 2021 Apr 1;149(4):2559–72. doi: 10.1121/10.0004128

19. Zalewski C, Sydlowski S, King KA, Bianconi S, Dang A, Porter FD, et al. Auditory phenotype of Smith–Lemli–Opitz syndrome. American Journal of Medical Genetics - Part A. 2021 Feb 2;185(4):1131–41. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.a.62087

20. Zhao S, Li D, Liu Z, Wang Y, Liu L, Jiang D, et al. Anthropometric growth study of the ear in a Chinese population. Journal of Plastic Reconstructive and Aesthetic Surgery. 2018 Apr 1;71(4):518–23