Preview

Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology

Advanced search

Breast asymmetry classification and diagnostics

https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2022-11-4-41-47

Abstract

Breast asymmetry is a polyetiological condition, which may be caused by congenital characteristics, developmental abnormalities, hormonal changes, traumas or surgery. The estimation of breast symmetry should be performed by the plastic surgeon while planning the augmentation or reduction mammoplasty as well as reconstructive surgery. Breast asymmetry is a widespread condition, according to some reports, it can be found in more than half of women. Anthropometric methods, as well as radiology methods, are used to diagnose and estimate breast asymmetry. There are many classification systems of breast asymmetry. The first ones were based on breast appearance or etiology of asymmetry, while modern classifications combine morphologic and etiologic principles. Today there is no conventional diagnostic protocol for breast asymmetry, where it would be listed, which breast parameters should be measured during breast asymmetry estimation. The first attempts were made in the middle of the XX century. Works of Penn, Smith and Westreich are considered to be basic in this field. Generally, relationships between major breast soft-tissue reference points (nipple, areola, submammary fold, lateral border) and bone structures (breastbone, jugular notch, clavicle) are estimated.

Mathematic formulas for counting breast volume depending on its linear measurements were developed as well. Nowadays the importance of skeleto-muscular system state (the presence of scoliosis or rib cage deformation) estimation is emphasized, while these conditions can also cause breast asymmetry.

About the Authors

M. V. Mnikhovich
A. P. Avtsyn Research Institute of Human Morphology of acad. B.V. Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery
Russian Federation

Maksim V. Mnikhovich – Cand. Med. Sci., Assoc. Prof., leading researcher of the central pathological anatomical laboratory

ul. Tsyurupy, 3, Moscow, 117418



A. S. Fedorova
Lomonosov Moscow State University
Russian Federation

Anna S. Fedorova – student

Moscow



A. V. Romanov
A. P. Avtsyn Research Institute of Human Morphology of acad. B. V. Petrovsky Russian Scientific Center of Surgery
Russian Federation

Aleksandr V. Romanov – junior researcher

Moscow



References

1. Alyautdin S.R. Asimmetriya molochnykh zhelez i skolioz. Sbornik nauchnykh tezisov i statei "Zdorov'e i obrazovanie v XXI veke". 2011;13(2):164 (in Russian). EDN: SBXQGZ

2. Kuklin IA, Zelenin VN. How to Determine the Volume of Mammary Gland? Plasticheskaya khirurgiya I kosmetologiya. 2011;1:61–5 (in Russian). EDN: NRMJAX

3. Milanov NO, Li AG. Asimmetriya molochnykh zhelez. K voprosu o khirurgicheskoi sistematizatsii. Annaly plasticheskoi rekonstruktivnoi i esteticheskoi khirurgii. 2006;2:59–67 (in Russian). EDN: KUCXIB

4. Milanov NO, Chausheva SI, Melnikov DV. Correction of Breast Asymmetry in Patients Presenting With Scoliosis and Other Spinal Deformities. Annaly plasticheskoi, rekonstruktivnoi i esteticheskoi khirurgii. 2011;1:49–55 (in Russian). EDN: NXOAJZ

5. Nikitin O. Breast Asymmetry: A Rule or Exclusion? Vrach. 2016;7:30–2 (in Russian). EDN: WHPVJZ

6. Sharobaro VI, Baeva AA, Romanets OP. Korrektsiya asimmetrii molochnykh zhelez. Annaly plasticheskoi, rekonstruktivnoi i esteticheskoi khirurgii. 2015;4:82–90 (in Russian). EDN: KXSMTR

7. Beraldo FNM, Veiga DF, Veiga-Filho J, Garcia ES, Vilas-Bôas GS, Juliano Y, et al. Sexual Function and Depression Outcomes Among Breast Hypertrophy Patients Undergoing Reduction Mammaplasty. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2016 Apr;76(4):379–82. doi: 10.1097/sap.0000000000000380

8. Brown TPLH, Ringrose C, Hyland RE, Cole AA, Brotherston TM. A method of assessing female breast morphometry and its clinical application British Journal of Plastic Surgery. 1999 Jul;52(5):355–9.. doi: 10.1054/bjps.1999.3110

9. Cabral IV, Garcia E da S, Sobrinho RN, Pinto NLL, Juliano Y, Veiga-Filho J, et al. Increased Capacity for Work and Productivity After Breast Reduction. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2016 Nov 10;37(1):57–62. doi: 10.1093/asj/sjw175

10. Chadbourne EB, Zhang S, Gordon MJ, Ro EY, Ross SD, Schnur PL, et al. Clinical outcomes in reduction mammaplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of published studies. Mayo Clinic Proceedings. 2001 May;76(5):503–10. doi: 10.4065/76.5.503

11. Denoel C, Ismael Aguirre MF, Bianco G, Mahaudens PH, Vanwijck R, Garson S, et al. Idiopathic scoliosis and breast asymmetry. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2009 Oct;62(10):1303–8. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.04.031

12. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, Znaor A, et al. Cancer statistics for the year 2020: an overview. International Journal of Cancer. 2021 Apr 5;149(4):778–89. doi: 10.1002/ijc.33588

13. Gabriel A, Fritzsche S, Creasman C, Baqai W, Mordaunt D, Maxwell GP. Incidence of Breast and Chest Wall Asymmetries: 4D Photography. Aesthetic Surgery Journal. 2011 Jul 1;31(5):506–10. doi: 10.1177/1090820x11410868

14. Kerrigan CL, Collins DE, Striplin D, Kim MH, Wilkins E, Cunningham B, et al. The Health Burden of Breast Hypertrophy. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2001 Nov;108(6):1591–9. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200111000-00024

15. Liu C, Luan J, Mu L, Ji K. The Role of Three-Dimnsional Scanning Technique in Evaluation of Breast Asymmetry in Breast Augmentation: A 100-Case Study. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2010 Dec;126(6):2125–32. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181f46ec6

16. Liu Y-J, Thomson JG. Ideal Anthropomorphic Values of the Female Breast. Annals of Plastic Surgery. 2011 Jul;67(1):7–11. doi: 10.1097/sap.0b013e3181f77ab5

17. Martinovic ME, Blanchet NP. BFACE. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2017 Aug;140(2):287e295e. doi: 10.1097/prs.0000000000003530

18. Nahai F. The art of aesthetic surgery. Missouri, St.Louis: Quality Medical Publishing; 2005.

19. Panchal H, Matros E. Current Trends in Post-Mastectomy Breast Reconstruction. Plastic and reconstructive surgery. 2017 Nov 1;140(5):7S13S. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000003941

20. Penn J. Breast reduction. Br J Plast Surg. 1954 Jan 1;7(C):357–71.

21. Pezner RD, Patterson MP, Hill LRobert, Vora N, Desai KR, Archambeau JO, et al. Breast retraction assessment: an objective evaluation of cosmetic results of patients treated conservatively for breast cancer. International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics. 1985 Mar;11(3):575–8. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(85)90190-7

22. Pitanguy I. Amastia and mammary asymmetries. The International microform Journal of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. Trans 2nd Congr Int Soc Aesthetic Plast Surg. 1974; 954.

23. Poland A. Deficiency of the pectoralis muscles. Guy’s Hosp Rep. 1841; 6: 191.

24. Rogliani M, Gentile P, Labardi L, Donfrancesco A, Cervelli V. Improvement of physical and psychological symptoms after breast reduction. Journal of Plastic, Reconstructive & Aesthetic Surgery. 2009 Dec;62(12):1647–9. doi: 10.1016/j.bjps.2008.06.067

25. Rohrich RJ, Hartley W, Brown S. Incidence of Breast and Chest Wall Asymmetry in Breast Augmentation: A Retrospective Analysis of 100 Patients. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2003 Apr;111(4):1513–9. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000049636.17522.1b

26. Romanini MV, Calevo MG, Puliti A, Vaccari C, Valle M, Senes F, et al. Poland syndrome: A proposed classification system and perspectives on diagnosis and treatment. Seminars in Pediatric Surgery. 2018 Jun 1 [cited 2021 Apr 5];27(3):189–99. doi: 10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2018.05.007

27. Sadove AM, van Aalst JA. Congenital and Acquired Pediatric Breast Anomalies: A Review of 20 Years Experience. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 2005 Apr;115(4):1039–50. doi: 10.1097/01.prs.0000154214.99641.72

28. Sherf M, Wiser I, Klein D, Heller L. Motivational Factors in Women Seeking Augmentation Mammoplasty Across Different Age Groups: A Cross-Sectional Survey. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 2018 Feb 19;42(4):941–50. doi: 10.1007/s00266-018-1100-7

29. Simon BE., Hoffman S, Kahn S. Treatment of Asymmetry of the Breasts: A Report of 30 Cases of Developmental Origin. Clinics in Plastic Surgery. 1975 Jul;2(3):375–90. doi: 10.1016/s0094-1298(20)30295-9

30. Smith DJ, Palin WE, Katch VL, Bennett JE. Breast Volume and Anthropomorphic Measurements. Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery. 1986 Sep;78(3):331–5. doi: 10.1097/00006534-198609000-00008

31. Thibodeau R, De Cicco FL. Poland Syndrome In Children. StatPearls. 2021 Jul 18;1–5.

32. Tsouskas LI, Fentiman IS. Breast compliance: A new method for evaluation of cosmetic outcome after conservative treatment of early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Research and Treatment. 1990 May;15(3):185–90. doi: 10.1007/bf01806355

33. Vandenbussche F. Asymmetries of the breast: A classification system. Aesthetic Plastic Surgery. 1984 Mar;8(1):27–36. doi: 10.1007/bf01572782

34. Viscardi JA, Oranges CM, Schaefer DJ, Kalbermatten DF. Reduction Mammoplasty: A Ten-Year Retrospective Review of the Omega Resection Pattern Technique. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 2021 Sep 27;10(19):4418. doi: 10.3390/jcm10194418

35. Westreich M. Anthropomorphic Breast Measurement: Protocol and Results in 50 Women with Aesthetically Perfect Breasts and Clinical Application. Plastic & Reconstructive Surgery. 1997 Aug;100(2):468–79. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199708000-00032


Review

For citations:


Mnikhovich M.V., Fedorova A.S., Romanov A.V. Breast asymmetry classification and diagnostics. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2022;11(4):41-47. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2022-11-4-41-47

Views: 383


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-7357 (Print)