Preview

Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology

Advanced search

Constitutional characteristics of the body surface area in women of different somatotypes

https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2020-9-3-49-53

Abstract

The aim of the study is to determine the features of the skin area in Kyrgyz women population in view of their constitutional groups and somatotypes.

Material and methods. We studied the physical status of 1028 Kyrgyz women of different age groups – the juvenile age group (n=310), the 1st adulthood age group (n=310), and the 2nd adulthood age group (n=410) living in Osh and its neighborhood applying anthropometric and bioimpedance methods. Statistical data processing was performed by statistical programs Microsoft Excel and the package STATISTICA 6.0. The differences between the two compared values were determined by the Student's criterion and they were considered significant at p<0.05.

Results. The performed study revealed the constitutional and somatotypological features of the skin area in the juvenile and both periods of adulthood in the female population. The body surface area is minimal in women of leptosomic group and maximum in megalosomic one. Somatotypological specificity is determined by the minimum value of this indicator in women of asthenic and stenoplastic types and by the maximum value in representatives of the euriplastic tall type. There is the tendency to increase the body skin area from the juvenile to the 2nd period of adulthood, which is typical for women of all somatotypes and constitutional groups.

Conclusion. The area of the skin is one of the indicators of human physical development, which has somatotypological specificity in representatives of various constitutional groups of the studied women population. The presented materials on the constitutional and typological features of the women’s physical status in relative norm conditions can serve as one of the bases for further development of a personalized approach in clinical medicine.

About the Author

K. Sh. Sakibaev
Osh State University
Kyrgyzstan
ul. Lenina, 331, Osh, 723500, Kyrgyzstan


References

1. Alexeeva NT, Rozhkova EA, Klochkova SV, Nikityuk DB, Gasymova TM, Kesemenli AK. Peculiarities of body surface area in women of different somatotypes regarding the age. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2017;6(2)9–13 (in Russian).

2. Women and men of the Kyrgyz Republic. Data from the national statistical Committee of the Kyrgyz Republic. Bishkek; 2015 (in Russian).

3. Martirosov EG. Metody issledovaniya v sportivnoi antropologii. Moscow: Fizkul'tura i sport; 1982 (in Russian).

4. Nikolenko VN, Nikityuk DB, Klochkova SV. Somaticheskaya konstitutsiya i klinicheskaya meditsina. Moscow: Prakticheskaya meditsina; 2017 (in Russian).

5. Петухов А.Б., Никитюк Д.Б., Сергеев В.Н. Медицинская антропология: анализ и перспективы развития в клинической практике. М.: Медпрактика; 2015. 512 [Petukhov AB, Nikityuk DB, Sergeev VN. Meditsinskaya antropologiya: analiz i perspektivy razvitiya v klinicheskoi praktike. Moscow: Medpraktika; 2015] (in Russian).

6. Саттаров А.Э., Сакибаев К.Ш. Особенности процессов роста у мальчиков и юношей, различных соматотипов юга Кыргызстана. Проблемы современной морфологии человека: сборник научных трудов, посвященный 90- летию кафедры анатомии ГЦОЛИФК и 85- летию со дня рождения заслуженного деятеля науки РФ, члена корреспондента РАМН, профессора Б.А. Никитюка. 2018:131–2 [Sattarov AE, Sakibaev KSh. Osobennosti protsessov rosta u mal'chikov i yunoshei, razlichnykh somatotipov yuga Kyrgyzstana. Problems of modern human morphology: collection of scientific papers dedicated to the 90th anniversary of the Department of anatomy gtsolifk and the 85th anniversary since the birth of honored scientist of the Russian Federation, correspondent member of RAMS, Professor B. A. Nikityuk. 2018:131–2] (in Russian).

7. Тутельян В.А., Никитюк Д.Б., Клочкова С.В., Алексеева Н.Т., и др. Использование метода комплексной антропометрии в спортивной и клинической практике. М.: Издательство ИП Григорьева Ю.С.; 2017. 50 [Tutel'yan VA, Nikityuk DB, Klochkova SV, Alekseeva NT, i dr. Ispol'zovanie metoda kompleksnoi antropometrii v sportivnoi i klinicheskoi praktike. Moscow: Izdatel'stvo IP Grigor'eva Yu.S.; 2017] (in Russian).

8. Galić BS, Pavlica T, Udicki M, Stokić E, Mikalački M, Korovljev D, et al. Somatotype characteristics of normal-weight and obese women among different metabolic subtypes. Archives of Endocrinology and Metabolism. 2016 Feb;60(1):60–5. doi: 10.1590/2359- 3997000000159

9. Kent S, Fusco F, Gray A, Jebb SA, Cairns BJ, Mihaylova B. Body mass index and healthcare costs: a systematic literature review of individual participant data studies. Obesity Reviews. 2017 May 22;18(8):869–79. doi: 10.1111/obr.12560

10. Sakibaev KSh, Nikityuk DB, Alekseyeva NT, Klochkova SV, Tashmatova NM. Characteristics of Muscle Mass in Women of Different Constitutions. Research Journal of Pharmacy and Technology. 2019;12(12):6193–97. doi: 10.5958/0974-360X.2019.01075.8

11. Nikolenko VN, Nikityuk DB, Klochkova SV, Bachmet AA. Constitutional and Anatomical Characteristics of Nature Women. J. of Harbin. 2015;6:567–71.

12. Pathak P, Adhikari A. Anthropometric Characteristics and Somatotype of Bengali Women Migrated from Bangladesh and Living in the Slum Areas near Railway Tracks in West Bengal. Ijsrm. Human. 2018;10(3):230–6.

13. Sebo P, Haller D, Pechère-Bertschi A, Bovier P, Herrmann F. Accuracy of doctors’ anthropometric measurements in general practice. Swiss Medical Weekly. 2015 Feb 21:145. doi: 10.4414/smw.2015.14115


Review

For citations:


Sakibaev K.Sh. Constitutional characteristics of the body surface area in women of different somatotypes. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2020;9(3):49-53. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2020-9-3-49-53

Views: 9859


Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License.


ISSN 2225-7357 (Print)