Somatic characteristics of patients suffering from alimentary-dependent diseases according to the Heath-Carter scheme and the possibility of its bioimpedance assessment
https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2022-11-3-49-56
Abstract
The aim of the study was to study the variability of the somatotype according to the Heath-Carter scheme in patients with alimentary-dependent pathology and the possibility of its bioimpedance assessment.
Material and methods. 104 patients (26 men and 78 women) were examined in the clinic of Federal State Budgetary Institution of Nutrition and Biotechnology. Patients underwent anthropometric studies in accordance with the accepted standard of Institute of Anthropology of M.V. Lomonosov Moscow State University. Somatotyping was calculated according to the Heath-Carter method. Bioimpedance assessment of body composition was carried out using the analyzer ABC-01 "Medass".
Results. On the basis of anthropometric measurements the age and sex characteristics of body types (somatotypes) according to Heath-Carter are presented in patients with alimentary-dependent pathologies (obesity of various degrees and type 2 diabetes mellitus). No significant differences of somatotype components in the age subgroups of the 1st and 2nd period of adulthood was found in men and women, although the values of Endomorphy and Mesomorphy in the subgroup of the 1st period of adulthood are greater than in the subgroup of the 2nd period of adulthood regardless of the sex of the subjects.
Conclusion. The study revealed that the average values of anthropometric indicators and the value of average Heath-Carter somatotypes in patients with alimentary-dependent pathologies do not significantly differ in age subgroups of the 1st and 2nd periods of adulthood in men and women, regardless of the sex of the subjects. Considering age subgroups and excluding age subgroups significant sexual dimorphism was observed in anthropometric indicators and in somatotype component, with the exception of body mass index (BMI). The inconsistency of somatotype assessment by Heath-Carter was shown in patients with alimentary-dependent pathologies according to bioimpedance analysis. In view of the significant correlation of bioimpedance and anthropometric measurements of somatotype components according to Heath-Carter, we consider it appropriate to develop new regression equations to evaluate the somatotype in the future.
About the Authors
M. M. SemenovRussian Federation
Muradin M. Semenov – researcher
ust'inskii proezd, 2/14, Moscow
I. A. Lapik
Russian Federation
Irina A. Lapik – Cand. Med. Sci.
Moscow
V. S. Sheragulova
Russian Federation
Valentina S. Sheragulova – resident
Moscow
V. A. Lebedeva
Russian Federation
Vera A. Lebedeva – resident
Moscow
S. V. Lavrinenko
Russian Federation
Moscow
K. V. Vybornaya
Russian Federation
Kseniya V. – researcher
Moscow
R. M. Radzhabkadiev
Russian Federation
Radzhabkadi M. Radzhabkadiev – researcher
Moscow
A. I. Sokolov
Russian Federation
Aleksandr I. Sokolov – Cand. Med. Sci.
Moscow
I. V. Kobel'kova
Russian Federation
Irina V. Kobel'kova – Cand. Med. Sci.
Moscow
K. M. Gapparova
Russian Federation
Kamilat M. Gapparova – Cand. Med. Sci.
Moscow
K. Kh. Sharafetdinov
Russian Federation
Khaider' Kh. Sharafetdinov – Doct. Med. Sci., Prof.
Moscow
Z. M. Zainudinov
Russian Federation
Zainudin M. Zainudinov – Doct. Med. Sci.
Moscow
N. T. Alexeeva
Russian Federation
Nataliya T. Alexeeva – Doct. Med. Sci., Prof.
Voronezh
S. V. Klochkova
Russian Federation
Svetlana V. Klochkova – Doct. Med. Sci., Prof.
Moscow
D. B. Nikityuk
Russian Federation
Dmitrii B. – Doct. Med. Sci., Prof., Acad. of RAS
Moscow
References
1. Alexeeva NT, Rozhkova EA, Klochkova SV, Nikityuk DB, Gasymova TM, Kesemenli AK. Peculiarities of Body Surface Area in Women of Different Somatotypes Regarding the Age. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2017;6(2):9–13 (in Russian). EDN: YSEPSZ. Doi: 10.18499/2225-7357-2017-6-2-9-13
2. Bukavneva NS, Nikitjuk DB. Constitutional peculiarities of patients with alimentary dependent pathology. Morphological Newsletter. 2008;1(1-2):145–6 (in Russian). EDN: MKUHBJ
3. Deryabin VE. Kratkii spravochnik poresheniyu tipovykh zadach biometricheskoi obrabotki antropologicheskikh dannykh. M.; 2005. Rukopis', deponirovannaya v VINITI №1187-V2005 ot 29.08.2005 (in Russian).
4. Klochkova SV, Rozhkova EA, Alexeeva NT, Nikityuk DB, Atyakshin DA, Ksemenli AK, et al. Features of the Content of Fat and Muscle Mass Among Young Women of Different Constitutional Groups. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2017;6(1):39–42 (in Russian). EDN: YHCSBH. doi: 10.18499/2225-7357-2017-6-1-39-42
5. Kolesnikov VA, Rudnev SG, Nikolaev DV, Anisimova AV, Godina EZ. On a new protocol of the heath-carter somatotype assessment using software for body composition bioimpedance analyzer. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seria XXIII. Antropologia. 2016;4:4–13 (in Russian). EDN: XHRCEL
6. Martirosov EG, Nikolaev DV, Rudnev SG. Tekhnologii i metody opredeleniya sostava tela cheloveka. M.: Nauka; 2006 (in Russian).
7. Nikolenko VN, Nikityuk DB, Chava SV. Otechestvennaya konstitutsional'naya anatomiya v aspekte personifitsirovannoi meditsiny. Sechenov Medical Journal. 2013;4:9–17 (in Russian). EDN: SNCKHJ
8. Pashkova I.G., Gaivoronskii I.V., Nikityuk D.B. Somatotip i komponentnyi sostav tela vzroslogo cheloveka. Sankt-Peterburg: SpetsLit; 2019 (in Russian). ISBN 978-5-299-00985-9
9. Rudnev SG, Anisimova AV, Sindeeva LV, Zadorozhnaya LV, Lukina SS, Malakhina AV, Vashura Ayu, Tseytlin GYa, Godina EZ. Methodological issues of studying variations in subcutaneous fat: a comparison of different types of skinfold calipers. Vestnik Moskovskogo Universiteta. Seria XXIII. Antropologia. 2017;3:4–26 (in Russian). EDN: YMOWAM
10. Sindeyeva LV, Rudnev SG. Characteristic of age and sex-related variability of the heath-carter somatotype in adults and possibility of its bioimpedance assessment (as exemplified by Russian population of Eastern Siberia). Morphology. 2017;151(1):77–87 (in Russian). EDN: YKUYXN
11. Anisimova AV, Godina EZ, Nikolaev DV, Rudnev SG. Evaluation of the Heath-Carter somatotype revisited: new bioimpedance equations for children and adolescents. IFMBE Proceedings. Eds.: F. Simini, P. Bertemes-Filho. Singapore-Heidelberg: Springer, 2016. doi: 10.1007/978-981-287-928-8_21
12. Carter JEL. The heath-carter anthropometric somatotype. Instruction manual. San Diego State University. San Diego, CA; 2002.
13. Carter JEL, Carter JEL, Heath BH. Somatotyping: development and applications. New York: Cambridge university press; 1990.
14. Heath BH, Carter JEL. A modified somatotype method American journal of physical anthropology. 1967 Jul;27(1):57-74. Doi: 10.1002/ajpa.1330270108
15. Koleva M, Nacheva A, Boev M. Somatotype and Disease Prevalence in Adults. Reviews on Environmental Health. 2002 Jan-Mar;17(1):65-84. doi: 10.1515/reveh.2002.17.1.65
16. Pastuszak A, Gajewski J, Buśko K. The impact of skinfolds measurement on somatotype determination in Heath-Carter method. Liao Y-H, editor. PLOS ONE. 2019 Sep 6;14(9):e0222100. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0222100
17. Rudnev SG, Negasheva MA, Godina EZ. Assessment of the Heath-Carter somatotype in adults using bioelectrical impedance analysis. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2019;1272(1):012001.
18. Sheldon WH, Stevens SS, Tucker WB. The varieties of human physique. New York: Harper and Brothers; 1940.
19. Yang L-T, Wang N, Li Z-X, Liu C, He X, Zhang JF, et al. Study on the adult physique with the Heath-Carter anthropometric somatotype in the Han of Xi’an, China. Anatomical Science International. 2015 May 5;91(2):180–7. doi: 10.1007/s12565-015-0283-0
Review
For citations:
Semenov M.M., Lapik I.A., Sheragulova V.S., Lebedeva V.A., Lavrinenko S.V., Vybornaya K.V., Radzhabkadiev R.M., Sokolov A.I., Kobel'kova I.V., Gapparova K.M., Sharafetdinov K.Kh., Zainudinov Z.M., Alexeeva N.T., Klochkova S.V., Nikityuk D.B. Somatic characteristics of patients suffering from alimentary-dependent diseases according to the Heath-Carter scheme and the possibility of its bioimpedance assessment. Journal of Anatomy and Histopathology. 2022;11(3):49-56. (In Russ.) https://doi.org/10.18499/2225-7357-2022-11-3-49-56